Thursday, September 6, 2012

From the Archives- Dance with Michelle Kuchuk, Guest Post!

July 19, 2012

Two blog posts in one day, you ask?!?! Ahhhh, the joys of summer programming. With her class starting tomorrow, Michelle Kuchuk took some time to journal about the many reasons she’s excited to teach tomorrow’s Dance workshop. 

Most of you know me as the embarassing-ly silly teacher in Daytime Moon’s past programs, but those of you who know me well know that I am incredibly invested in the academic relevance of everything we do here at Daytime Moon. It may seem like we just like to have fun, and certainly that joy is the centerpiece of all of our programs, but there is a substantial amount of scientific data supporting every curricular choice we’ve made. If you’ve gotten a chance to read the article Emily shared with you the other week from Autism Spectrum News, called “Everyone Can Play-Using Theatre to Promote Developmental Gains,” you’ve seen some of the scientific support for theatre. But Michelle has taken this opportunity to share some exciting research about her discipline, Dance. And it’s mind-blowing!

So, from one nerd to (I hope) many more, it gives me such joy to share with you Michelle’s journal. I hope it’ll resonate with you the same way it resonated with me, and that you’ll join us on Facebook,  
Twitter and YouTube tomorrow at 4PM for all of the updates from her classroom!

Cheers!
Jenna

And without further ado… MICHELLE!
***

Most of you know me as Jenna’s assistant teacher for all of our regular programs, but tomorrow I’ll be teaching the dance workshop as part of Daytime Moon’s summer series!  My mom used to be a choreographer and danced for most of her adult life, and I probably watched Gene Kelly or Fred Astaire tap their way into a frenzy on the day I was born (her favorite movie of all time being “Singin’ in the Rain”).  I’ve been dancing at least in some sort of capacity since I was three, having fallen back in love with dance in the last two years, so I was therefore incredibly excited when Jenna asked me to teach our dance workshop!  Since I’ve now been working with Daytime Moon for a year and a half, I was also really excited to figure out how I could apply this particular medium into our usual methodologies and reasoning behind our classic theatrical programming. 

As it turns out, there is a lot of exciting and newer research to be learned about some of the benefits from learning a skill such as music or dance – benefits that you might think you could guess (as I did), when in reality, the research reveals far more than what is typically held to be common knowledge. 

I’ll start at the beginning.  The great thing about dance whether you’re Michael Jackson, a Daytime Moon student, the star of Swan Lake, or me, is that while learning a new dance step does require some verbal instruction, we can only dance anything complicated after forming nonverbal knowledge, commonly known as muscle memory.  (In actuality, the phrase ‘muscle memory’ is a bit of a misnomer as it is our brain networks, and not our muscles, that store memories of movements.  These memories can therefore be more correctly referred to as motor memories.  The important point, though, is that these motor memories are specific to movement and distinctly different from the memories of the verbal instructions of the same action.)  I can tell you about a pliĆ© in ballet or a time step in tap until I’m blue in the face, but you’ll only even begin to interpret the step until you see ME do it, and only truly learn it if YOU do it. 

WHAT?!  First of all: does the chunk of the brain that gets activated when my student sees me perform a dance step get activated when he performs the same step?  Research has shown again and again that there is a huge overlap, that certain networks of the brain get activated when both doing and observing the same action.  Does the network get more activated if the student was already a pro at the step he was watching me perform?  Yes: a network in the cortex called the action observation network becomes even more active when we watch a step that we are already physically familiar with.   This body of research suggests that the action observation network is a ‘general-purpose observational learning network for simulating actions, and it is cued by both physical and symbolic models.’  We learn better by DOING. 

WHAT?!  Schools typically emphasize reading, writing, and math because these subjects are supposed to produce development in reasoning, abstraction, and semantic knowledge.  The only reason P.E. is probably still in some curricula is because of the health benefits – I know I’m not alone in remembering how I ‘got out of it’ in order to take more advanced classes in history and English.  Courses focusing on physical knowledge such as wood shop, music, dance, and theatre are being cut, and are often only ‘saved’ when these mediums are thought to help with academic learning.  We assume that anyone with sufficient cognitive abilities can gain physical knowledge if they just put their minds to it; this interpretation of the relationship between ‘knowing’ (cognitively) and ‘doing’ is false, and yet it dominates educational policy and practice today.  Any importance placed on the arts is viewed through the lens of helping a child learn the core subjects.  I’m sure most of us (me included) have defended the arts in this way, and it’s an extremely important and valid point (which I’ll explain in more depth in just a sec) … but it’s actually not the whole story.  All of those crazy sentences about action networks and observational learning show us that a whole wealth of ‘other’ knowledge comes from experiencing the physical world – knowledge that is separate from and not JUST supporting cognitive knowledge and training.  Experiential knowledge is inherent in creating surgeons, scientists, innovators, truck drivers… the list goes on.  Their learning comes from observational and imitative learning, which this action observation network facilitates. 

…But yes, there is a whole ton of ongoing research that supports the fact that learning and performing an art – if we practice a lot and are truly engaged – strengthens the brain’s attention system which improves cognition more generally (measured by IQ scores, among other means).  Attention plays a crucial role in learning and memory, and this, without question, improves cognitive performance.  It might seem obvious, or something you kinda just assumed was true, but it’s actually pretty scientific: our brain changes according to what we do, in other words, our behaviors shape our brain.  If we find an art that we like and it completely engages us and then we stick with it, learning and memory (especially) will improve.  The more and more we practice our clarinet, the more and more efficient that specific clarinet brain network becomes.  And because everything in the brain seems to happen in conjunction, this increased efficiency in the clarinet network causes all of our other attention networks to become more efficient, like, for example, a network called the executive attention network.  This particular network is especially interesting because it helps us control our emotions, and choose among conflicting thoughts in a specific moment (should I play the B flat or the A minor?) in order to focus on our long-term goals (I want to be a musician, graduate high school, etc).  These abilities are also important in creating social and academic success by helping to develop empathy and manage impulses.  Getting back to dancing specifically, it has been shown that empathy can also be gained from movements alone: after watching dance clips, observers could gauge whether the dancer was happy, sad, or nervous based only on their body movements. 

The last yet extremely important facet of teaching the arts is based around finding passion.  The need or want to learn the skills of music, dance, theater, painting, film, or building your own guitar is a source of important motivation that spreads to all aspects of any learner’s life.  Our brain is an unbelievable and curious entity, and research is showing more and more how brain systems are actually driven by passionate interests and physical skills.  This is not to say that every single person out there is going to learn ‘better’ by engaging in some sort of art form.  But when kids find that particular artistic endeavor that they really love, you’d be hard-pressed to find another subject that would produce such strong and sustained attention that happens to also be incredibly rewarding and motivating. 

So what the heck do I want and expect from my workshop tomorrow?  This is a one-time workshop and will be an introduction to just getting in our bodies while having a whole bunch of fun, but I guess this blog illustrates a few of the reasons why we wanted to introduce our students to different mediums: so they could find the art form they loved best but still experience it in the context of the practices and approach of Daytime Moon.  With dance, it’s nice to know that not all learning has to be so verbal – even though we are engaging our minds.  Dance gets into our bodies and our brains in ways that just maybe, we never really expected.  

I’ll be blogging again after my class tomorrow (and I promise to leave out all talk of observation networks) but I’ll leave you with this: I was four years old the first time I was ever onstage.  I was in a dance recital, and we were all lions.  We took our bows, and then 4-year-old Michelle sneaked back onstage for a second bow.  In tomorrow’s class, I hope to include not only lions, but the joy that must have been at play for me to have bowed twice.

Don’t forget to follow along on all our social media!

See you in class,
Michelle

No comments:

Post a Comment